|
Give up Cambridge, Massachusetts, for Appleton, Wisconsin?
That's just what Montanan Rob Geck did when he turned down
the opportunity to attend Harvard. And the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology. And, for that matter, Boston University.
Instead, he decided to enroll at Lawrence University in Appleton.
As a high school sophomore, Geck had attended a summer school
at Lawrence, located in a city of sixty-five thousand residents
in northeastern Wisconsin, and had a great time. That memory
stayed with him when he revisited the campus a couple of years
later and found the college's staff offering him a great deal
of personal attention. But nothing made him change his mind
more than a particularly interesting conversation with Lawrence's
medical advisor.
"He told me in my case the next four years should be hard
for me but the four years in med school are going to be really
hard and you don't have much of a life during that time,"
remembers Geck, who attended a high school with just four hundred
students. "He told me you should have a little more fun
and become more of a well-rounded person in college and not
take all biology or all chemistry or all mathyou have
to mix it in with some fun courses."
While the eighteen-year-old student-athlete, who plans to
play football and baseball at Lawrence, is pretty competitive,
he did not want the pressure he thought would come with a
name school. Geck figures Lawrence will not be an easy ride,
either, but at least its admissions propaganda did not play
up a hellish scenario of all work and no play.
"In the material from some of the high-profile schools,
the big emphasis was we're going to grill you so hard
you're going to cry for Mom, you're never going to have time
to sleep, and you'll just want to go home,'" he says.
"I like a more easy, well-rounded approach right now."
Status-conscious
Lawrence is just one of many schools around the country
that have managed to attract gifted students bound for "name"
schools before they changed tracks. Name institutions continue
to tempt the nation's brightest high school students, but
many are opting for a more personal and individualized education
provided by less rarefied schools.
With more than $20,000 a year in tuition on the line, students
and their parents often want a good national reputation as
part of the college package, and the Ivy League and other
name institutions allegedly offer to confer an exalted status
upon students. Yet should schools' status really matter that
much, especially in a time of economic upheaval and the arrival
of the information age?
"It's a status industry, and people are very status
conscious," says Loren Pope, author of Looking Beyond
The Ivy League (Penguin). "What they don't realize is
people who are interested in status are fighting the last
war, because kids are going into a new world where status
won't make a bit of difference. They're all going to be working
in careers twenty years from now that don't exist today."
Whether Pope's right on that count remains open to debate.
A July 1995 cover story in Newsweek on the "overclass"
pointed out that an anonymous survey of Harvard's 1970 class
at a recent twenty-fifth reunion showed one-quarter of its
graduates had a net worth of more than $1 million. Yet Pope
thinks the future may turn out differently since skills and
talents will be more important than family or educational
pedigree.
Pope contends that a large number of relatively less known
schools exist where a student can receive an excellent education
as challenging as any the name schools offer. The pleasant
confines of the sixty-acre Austin College in Sherman, Texas,
receives high praise from Pope, as does the College of Wooster
in Wooster, Ohio. Though Wooster College is not as selective
as the Ivies in admitting students, Pope says it "outperforms
all the Ivies in the percentage of people who become scientists
and scholars and Ph.D.s." He found twenty-nine other
schools in his research that had a higher percentage of their
graduates go on to become scientists and earn Ph.D.s than
did the Ivy League schools.
But Pope confesses the name game thrives despite the best
efforts of lesser- known colleges and universities. Too often
parents and children get sucked into a status game where the
name means more than the education.
To get beyond the name, Pope suggests looking at whether
an institution promotes competitive or collaborative learning
and how closely faculty members work with students. At some
colleges as many as 30 percent of papers written by professors
for conferences and publication are co-authored by undergraduate
students. And even though name universities say that professors
teach most classes, Pope sees the opposite: "One of my
young friends quit an Ivy in disgust and said, I'm being
taught by studentsand some who can't even speak English.'"
Not so for all big or name universities, says Scott R. Vaughn,
assistant director of the Honors Program at Michigan State
University. At the Big 10 universities, he says, more than
85 percent of all classes are taught by tenured faculty, and
gifted students who enter university honors programs have
several opportunities to work closely with professors on projects.
The Honors Program at MSU boasts 220 faculty members who advise
nine hundred students in the four year program, he says, and
a new honors' initiative gives thirty-seven incoming freshmen
a chance to work directly with professors and other faculty
on research projects.
The Rankings
Students beginning the process of choosing schools usually
list five or six they find appealing and then often, along
with their parents, check to see how those institutions rank
in U.S. News & World Report or Money magazine. Yet an
exhaustive investigative report by the Wall Street Journal,
published in April 1995, showed many schools commonly lie
about their alleged selectivity. Dozens of colleges routinely
exclude "low scoring students from their SAT numbers"
and often manipulate low acceptance rates to showcase their
high standards.
"In their heated efforts to woo students," wrote
WSJ reporter Steve Stecklow, "many colleges manipulate
what they report to magazine surveys and guidebooksnot
only on test scores but on applications, acceptances, enrollment
and graduation rates."
"U.S. News & World Report does a great disservice
to society," says Pope. "You cannot quantify quality
the way they're trying to do it. And selectivity and quality
aren't necessarily synonymous."
The admissions office of Atlanta's Emory University, a school
rated the sixteenth best university in the country in one
ranking, does not even bother making note of that standing
in any of its materials, according to Daniel Walls, director
of admissions. Though a few parents and students come in waving
copies of U.S. News & World Report's guide and say "we
know you're number X" in the ratings, Walls tries to
tell prospective students that choosing a school involves
more than rankings.
His staff, for example, would rather show off the school's
wooded suburban campus, buildings, faculty, and rate of graduate
school placements. They would rather speak about Atlanta's
growth as the South's leading metropolis and the upcoming
Olympicsand how both those attributes play a positive
role in attracting students. They would rather students determine
whether they fit into Emory's diverse student body and wide
range of majors, says Walls, than simply compare how the school
rates regionally and nationally.
At Macalester College in St. Paullike Emory, located
in a residential neighborhood of a large metropolitan areathe
admissions staff has the same strategy, says Steve Colee,
director of admissions. While the college has scored well
in rankings, Macalester instead talks about its national and
international flavor, number of students who have received
grants and fellowships, and collaborative projects with faculty
members, says Colee.
Macalester even addresses the issue of "name" schools
in an admissions office pamphlet that suggests its educational
offerings are every bit as good as Ivy League schools'. "We're
notand don't intend to becomean Ivy League imitation.
We're simply an excellent way to get an Ivy-caliber education,"
the piece brags, before proceeding to look at the campus and
various programs.
Picking Programs
Colee, Walls, and other education and admissions staff prefer
that students think less about an institution's name and more
about what they want and how that fits with their institutions.
Students, says Colee, first have to figure out whether they
want a large school or small and whether distance from home
matters. Along with their parents, they must decide how much
they want to spend and consider the financial package a particular
institution offers.
Then comes the detective work. Pope strongly believes they
should always "check out the merchandise" by visiting
their top choices. Emory's Walls adds that students should
research the bottom half of their lists as well as they do
the top half because they may not get accepted every place
they apply.
Generally, students should find out if classes are taught
by professors and ask about the student/faculty ratio. They
should take a look at the sequence of courses in certain majors
in which they have an interest and see whether the structure
is rigid or more open and if that style fits with their educational
needs.
Even if students believe they know what major they want to
pursue, they should still check on how flexible colleges can
be in that area. When must they declare a major and how hard
is it to change? And if they decide against their initial
choice, does the college have a sufficient number of majors
they can transfer into later?
Thinking about graduate school, however distant that seems
to high school students, may also play a role in deciding
against a name school, since many lesser-known schools have
better records than name schools of sending undergraduates
on to good graduate programs. So, if students plan to go to
graduate school, they should look at placement rates of schools
they want to attend and see where those graduates ended up.
How many students go on to post-graduate study? Where do they
generally go? Does the school have any special relationships
with post-graduate institutions or medical or law schools?
If work, rather than graduate school, is in the cards, students
should ask the placement offices of colleges whether graduates
have found jobs in their fields, at what salary range, and
what kinds of networking opportunities the college offers
graduating seniors. They might also inquire how active alumni
are in recruiting graduates or in helping them network to
find jobs. While name schools may excel in this area, lesser-known
schools can also offer good job opportunities for students.
Finally, students should decide what college atmosphere best
suits their personality. What kind of students attend the
college? Where do they generally come from? What's the campus
scene like? Straight-laced, hip, apolitical, political, serious-minded
or party-hearty? Macalester has a history of community and
political involvement, for example, with volunteerism playing
a big role for some students. For a student who wants a mix
of both the diversity of a big school and the intimacy of
a small one, an honors program of the sort at MSU, common
at most large universities, might be just the ticket.
As one wise sage once put it, where students attend college
may be much less important than what they make of it once
they're there.
Frank
Jossi spent three years as program director of an international
press institute at Macalester College and has taught twice
overseas on Fulbright Scholarships.
|