|
1. B
(1) Insufficient. It may look like the two are equal, but
not necessarily. All the statement tells us is that x2 is
equal to y2. That doesn't mean that x equals y, because one
could be negative and the other positive.
(2) Sufficient. This tells us that (x - y) (x - y) = 0. So,
(x - y) = 0. The only way the difference between the two variables
can be 0 is if they are the same.
2. A.
(1) Sufficient. Since the quantity 2R is divisible by 3,
one of those two factors must be divisible by 3. Since 1 isn't;
R must be.
(2) Insufficient. We know that quantity 3R is evenly divisible
by 3, which means that at least one of the factors must be
divisible by 3. The problem, though, is that 3 is evenly divisible
by 3, making it impossible for us to determine if R is.
3. D
(1) Sufficient. With the distance known, we could plug it
into the rate formula and computer Bill's rate.
(2) Sufficient. If he covered the same distance at 30 mph
as he did at 60 mph, he must have been traveling at 30 mph
for twice as long as he was at 60 mph. Given that he traveled
for 3 hours, he traveled at 30 mph for 2 hours and 60 mph
for 1 hour. That comes to 120 miles total distance, and again
we solve for the rate.
4. E
(1) Insufficient. Pick 10 for x and 5 for y. This satisfies
the statement and would allow us to answer "yes" to the question.
We can't stop here though; we have to try different values
to see if we can answer the question, "no." Try 5 for x and
-10 for y. These values satisfy statement (1) but allow us
to answer the question "no."
(2) Insufficient. Try the same values. Those values allow
us to answer "no" to the question. But we need to consider
other values. If we set y equal to -5 and x equal to 10, we
can answer "yes" to the question.
You could guess between (C) and (E) or you could plug in
some more numbers. As it turns out the two statements are
equivalent. So they are just as insufficient together as they
are separate.
5. E
(1) Insufficient. Only information about the tie is given.
We know nothing about the belt.
(2) Insufficient. Only information about the belt is given.
We know nothing about the tie.
All we can determine is that a greater percentage discount
was obtained on the belt. Whether this translates into a greater
dollar discount cannot be determined.
|